Central Problem

Hume confronts the ultimate epistemological challenge: can empiricism, when pursued with rigorous consistency, provide any foundation for knowledge at all? While Locke accepted the validity of knowledge within the limits of experience, and Berkeley preserved spiritual substance while denying material substance, Hume asks whether experience can justify even our most basic beliefs—in causation, the external world, and personal identity.

The problem has both theoretical and practical dimensions. Theoretically, if all our ideas derive from impressions (sensory experiences), what justifies our belief that the future will resemble the past, that causes necessarily produce effects, or that there exists a unified self persisting through time? Practically, given that our lives depend entirely on such beliefs, what is their actual foundation if not reason?

Hume’s investigation represents the culmination and crisis of modern empiricism. By rigorously applying the principle that every legitimate idea must trace back to a corresponding impression, he exposes the lack of rational foundation for beliefs that humans cannot help holding. This creates a profound tension between philosophical skepticism and natural belief.

Main Thesis

Hume’s central thesis is that human knowledge, when rigorously examined, proves to be founded not on reason but on habit, custom, and natural instinct. The necessity we attribute to causal connections is merely subjective—a product of psychological habit rather than objective rational insight. This leads to a “mitigated skepticism” that limits knowledge to relations of ideas (mathematics) and matters of fact (probable empirical generalizations).

Impressions and Ideas: All mental contents (“perceptions”) divide into impressions (vivid, forceful sensations, passions, emotions) and ideas (faint copies of impressions in memory and imagination). Every legitimate idea must derive from a corresponding impression—this is Hume’s fundamental principle and criterion for evaluating concepts.

Relations of Ideas vs. Matters of Fact: Hume distinguishes:

  • Relations of ideas: Propositions true by definition, discoverable by pure thought, whose denial is contradictory (mathematics, logic). These are certain but tell us nothing about existence.
  • Matters of fact: Propositions about existence, based on experience, whose denial is always conceivable. These tell us about the world but lack certainty.

Critique of Causation: The causal relation cannot be known a priori—we cannot deduce effects from causes by pure reason. Experience shows only constant conjunction (A regularly followed by B), never necessary connection. The “necessity” we feel is merely subjective—a product of habit. After repeatedly observing A followed by B, we form the expectation that B will follow A, but this expectation has no rational justification.

The Role of Habit: Habit (custom) is the “great guide of human life.” It produces in us the disposition to expect the future to resemble the past, to believe in causal connections, to act as if our beliefs were certain. Habit explains why we believe, but cannot justify our beliefs.

Belief in External World and Personal Identity: We have no impression of “substance” underlying our perceptions, nor of a unified, persisting “self.” The mind is merely “a bundle of perceptions” succeeding one another. Yet we naturally believe in external objects and personal identity—beliefs produced by imagination and habit, not reason.

Moral Sentiment: Morality is founded on sentiment, not reason. Reason alone cannot motivate action—only passion can. Moral judgments express feelings of approval or disapproval based on the perceived utility of actions for human happiness. The “moral sense” is grounded in natural sympathy with others.

Historical Context

Hume (1711-1776) lived during the Scottish Enlightenment, a remarkable period of intellectual flourishing in Edinburgh that produced major figures in philosophy, economics, and science. Scotland, though recently united with England (1707), developed its own distinctive intellectual culture, less ecclesiastical and more cosmopolitan than English thought.

Born in Edinburgh, Hume came to philosophy young, composing his Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40) before age 30 while living in France. The work’s initial failure (“It fell dead-born from the press”) led him to recast its ideas in more accessible form in the Enquiries (1748, 1751). His celebrity came through his Essays and History of England, making him the most famous British man of letters of his time.

The intellectual context included Newton’s triumph in natural philosophy, which inspired Hume’s ambition to become “the Newton of the moral sciences”—applying empirical, experimental method to human nature itself. Hume admired Newton’s achievement while questioning whether similar certainty was attainable for knowledge of human affairs.

Hume’s religious skepticism, expressed in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (published posthumously, 1779) and Natural History of Religion (1757), made him controversial. He was twice denied university positions on grounds of alleged atheism. Yet he was personally admired for his good humor, sociability, and moral character—demonstrating that philosophical skepticism need not undermine practical virtue.

Hume’s influence was decisive for Kant, who acknowledged that Hume “awakened me from my dogmatic slumber” and stimulated the critical philosophy that sought to overcome Humean skepticism.

Philosophical Lineage

flowchart TD
    Ockham --> Locke
    Locke --> Berkeley
    Berkeley --> Hume
    Newton --> Hume
    Locke --> Hume
    Hutcheson --> Hume
    Hume --> Kant
    Hume --> Bentham
    Hume --> Mill
    Hume --> Logical-Positivism
    Hume --> Naturalized-Epistemology

    class Ockham,Locke,Berkeley,Newton,Hume,Hutcheson,Kant,Bentham,Mill,Logical-Positivism,Naturalized-Epistemology internal-link;

Key Thinkers

ThinkerDatesMovementMain WorkCore Concept
Hume1711-1776British EmpiricismTreatise of Human NatureSkepticism about causation, habit
Locke1632-1704British EmpiricismEssay Concerning Human UnderstandingIdeas from experience
Berkeley1685-1753British EmpiricismPrinciples of Human KnowledgeEsse est percipi
Newton1642-1727Scientific RevolutionPrincipia MathematicaExperimental method
Kant1724-1804German IdealismCritique of Pure ReasonTranscendental idealism

Key Concepts

ConceptDefinitionRelated to
ImpressionsVivid, forceful perceptions: sensations, passions, emotions as originally experiencedHume, Empiricism
IdeasFaint copies or images of impressions in memory and thoughtHume, Epistemology
Relations of ideasPropositions true by definition, certain but not about existence (mathematics, logic)Hume, Logic
Matters of factPropositions about existence, based on experience, always uncertainHume, Epistemology
Constant conjunctionThe observed regularity of one event following another; all we perceive of causationHume, Causation
Habit/CustomThe psychological disposition, produced by repetition, to expect future to resemble pastHume, Psychology
Association of ideasThe natural tendency of mind to connect ideas by resemblance, contiguity, or causationHume, Psychology
BeliefA vivid idea associated with present impression; natural instinct, not rational judgmentHume, Epistemology
Bundle theoryThe self is nothing but a bundle of perceptions succeeding one anotherHume, Personal Identity
Moral sentimentFeelings of approval/disapproval based on perceived utility; foundation of ethicsHume, Ethics

Authors Comparison

ThemeHumeLockeBerkeley
Source of knowledgeImpressions onlyExperience (sensation and reflection)Ideas perceived by mind
CausationHabit, no objective necessityReal connection in natureGod’s regular action
External worldBelief without rational justificationExists, known through ideasDoes not exist independently
Personal identityBundle of perceptionsContinuous consciousnessSpiritual substance
SubstanceUnintelligible fictionUnknown substratumSpirit only
Abstract ideasParticular ideas as signsGeneral ideas by abstractionParticular ideas as signs
Role of reasonLimited to relations of ideasGuide within experienceInstrument of religion
Moral foundationSentiment, sympathyRational demonstrationDivine command

Influences & Connections

  • Predecessors: Hume ← influenced by ← Locke (empiricism), Berkeley (nominalism, critique of abstraction)
  • Predecessors: Hume ← influenced by ← Newton (experimental method), Hutcheson (moral sense theory)
  • Contemporaries: Hume ↔ dialogue with ↔ Smith (sympathy, economics), Rousseau (brief friendship/quarrel)
  • Followers: Hume → influenced → Kant (critical philosophy), Bentham (utilitarianism)
  • Followers: Hume → influenced → Mill (empiricism, utilitarianism), Logical Positivism (verification principle)
  • Opposing views: Hume ← criticized by ← Reid (common sense philosophy), Kant (transcendental response)

Summary Formulas

  • Hume: All ideas derive from impressions; causation is mere constant conjunction plus psychological habit; reason is the slave of the passions; the self is a bundle of perceptions; morality rests on sentiment and sympathy.
  • Locke: Experience is the source and limit of knowledge; within those limits, reason can attain certainty about self, God, and present sensations.
  • Berkeley: All that exists are minds and their ideas; God guarantees the order and continuity of our perceptions.
  • Kant: Hume’s skepticism must be overcome by showing that the mind’s a priori categories make objective experience possible.

Timeline

YearEvent
1711Hume born in Edinburgh, Scotland
1734-1737Hume lives in France, composes Treatise of Human Nature
1739-1740Hume publishes Treatise of Human Nature (unsuccessful)
1741-1742Hume publishes Essays, Moral and Political (successful)
1748Hume publishes Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding
1751Hume publishes Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals
1752Hume becomes librarian in Edinburgh; begins History of England
1757Hume publishes Natural History of Religion
1763-1766Hume serves as secretary to British embassy in Paris
1776Hume dies in Edinburgh
1779Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion published posthumously

Notable Quotes

“When we run over libraries, persuaded of these principles, what havoc must we make? If we take in our hand any volume—of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance—let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity or number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames, for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion.” — Hume

“Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them.” — Hume

“The mind is a kind of theatre, where several perceptions successively make their appearance; pass, re-pass, glide away, and mingle in an infinite variety of postures and situations.” — Hume


NOTE

This summary has been created to present the key points from the source text, which was automatically extracted using LLM. Please note that the summary may contain errors. It serves as an essential starting point for study and reference purposes.