Central Problem

The central problem addressed by Hobbes concerns the foundations of political order and peaceful coexistence among human beings. How can a stable and orderly society be established given the fundamentally egoistic and conflictual nature of humans? Hobbes rejects the Aristotelian conception of man as a naturally political animal, arguing instead that without a supreme authority, humans would exist in a perpetual “state of nature” characterized by a war of all against all (bellum omnium contra omnes).

The philosophical challenge Hobbes confronts is twofold: first, to establish a purely rational foundation for political philosophy that excludes supernatural revelation and ancient authorities, finding inspiration solely in the world of nature; second, to demonstrate how reason itself can lead humans out of their miserable natural condition toward a commonwealth that guarantees peace and security. This requires reconceiving the nature of reason itself—not as a faculty for discovering eternal truths, but as a calculative technique for predicting consequences and making advantageous choices.

Hobbes’s project also involves addressing fundamental metaphysical questions about the nature of reality and knowledge. His materialist framework holds that only bodies exist and can be objects of scientific knowledge, which has profound implications for understanding human nature, morality, and the foundations of political authority.

Main Thesis

Hobbes’s main thesis is that reason, understood as a calculative faculty operating through language, reveals that the only path out of the destructive state of nature is the establishment of an absolute sovereign through a social contract. This thesis unfolds across several interconnected claims:

On Reason and Knowledge: Human reason differs from animal cognition through its use of conventional linguistic signs, which enable generalization and long-term planning. Reasoning is fundamentally calculation—the addition and subtraction of concepts. True scientific knowledge (demonstrative knowledge that proceeds from causes to effects) is possible only for objects created by humans: mathematics, ethics, and politics. Natural objects, created by God, can only be known probabilistically through a posteriori demonstrations from effects to causes.

On Materialism: Only bodies exist; the word “incorporeal” is meaningless. All phenomena—including sensation, imagination, and thought—are movements in matter. Even the human soul is corporeal, and all moral valuations (good and evil) are subjective, relative to individual desires. There is no absolute good or ultimate end in human life, for “life is an incessant movement.”

On Natural Right and Natural Law: In the state of nature, every person has a right to everything (ius omnium in omnia), including the bodies of others, resulting in the famous formula homo homini lupus (man is a wolf to man). This natural right must be distinguished from natural law, which is a rational precept directing humans toward self-preservation. The three fundamental laws of nature prescribe: (1) seek peace (pax est quaerenda); (2) renounce the unlimited right to all things when others do likewise (ius in omnia est retinendum); (3) keep covenants (pacta servanda sunt).

On the State: The social contract creates the Leviathan—an absolute sovereign who embodies the will of all citizens. The sovereign’s power is indivisible, irreversible, and unlimited; the sovereign is legibus solutus (unbound by law) because justice and injustice only exist where there is law, and law only exists where there is sovereign power.

Historical Context

Hobbes (1588-1679) lived through one of the most turbulent periods in English history, marked by civil war, regicide, and the struggle between parliamentary and royal authority. Born in Westport, England, his education at Oxford was supplemented by extensive travels on the European continent, where he encountered the leading intellectual figures of his age: Galilei, Gassendi, Mersenne, and through the latter, Descartes (to whom he sent his Objections to the Meditations).

The English Civil War (1642-1651), the execution of Charles I (1649), and Cromwell’s Commonwealth profoundly shaped Hobbes’s political thought. His masterwork, the Leviathan (1651), appeared during this period of upheaval, offering a philosophical justification for absolute sovereignty that could, in principle, be exercised by any form of government capable of maintaining order.

Hobbes’s intellectual context includes the Scientific Revolution and the new mechanical philosophy. His materialism and mechanicism reflect the influence of Galilean physics, while his geometric method in political philosophy parallels the mathematical approach to nature championed by the new science. His nominalism about language and conventionalism about morality represent a decisive break with scholastic philosophy.

The natural law tradition, particularly as represented by Grozio‘s De iure belli ac pacis (1625), provided both a framework and a foil for Hobbes’s political theory. While accepting the possibility of treating politics as a science and the need to prescind from historical contingency, Hobbes radically transformed the content of natural law from a set of eternal moral principles to prudential rules for self-preservation.

Philosophical Lineage

flowchart TD
    Aristotle --> Hobbes
    Euclid --> Hobbes
    Galilei --> Hobbes
    Gassendi --> Hobbes
    Grozio --> Hobbes
    Descartes --> Hobbes
    Hobbes --> Spinoza
    Hobbes --> Locke
    Hobbes --> Rousseau
    Hobbes --> Vico
    Hobbes --> Bobbio

    class Aristotle,Euclid,Galilei,Gassendi,Grozio,Descartes,Hobbes,Spinoza,Locke,Rousseau,Vico,Bobbio internal-link;

Key Thinkers

ThinkerDatesMovementMain WorkCore Concept
Hobbes1588-1679MaterialismLeviathanSocial contract, absolute sovereignty
Grozio1583-1645Natural LawDe iure belli ac pacisNatural rights as pre-political
Descartes1596-1650RationalismMeditationsThinking substance
Galilei1564-1642Scientific RevolutionDialogueMechanical physics
Spinoza1632-1677RationalismEthicsSubstance monism
Locke1632-1704EmpiricismTwo TreatisesLimited government

Key Concepts

ConceptDefinitionRelated to
State of natureHypothetical pre-political condition characterized by war of all against all due to natural equality in vulnerability and competing desiresHobbes, Social Contract
Ius omnium in omniaNatural right of everyone to everything, including others’ bodies, which makes the state of nature a condition of warHobbes, Natural Right
Bellum omnium contra omnesWar of all against all; the inevitable result of the state of nature where no common power existsHobbes, Political Philosophy
Homo homini lupus”Man is a wolf to man”; expresses the dangerous and predatory nature of humans in the state of natureHobbes, Anthropology
Natural law (lex naturalis)Rational precept discovered by reason that prohibits actions destructive of life and commands what preserves itHobbes, Natural Law
LeviathanThe absolute sovereign (individual or assembly) created by social contract; a “mortal god”Hobbes, Absolutism
Social contractAgreement among individuals to transfer their natural rights to a sovereign in exchange for peace and securityHobbes, Political Philosophy
Legibus solutus”Unbound by law”; the sovereign’s position above the laws, since law derives from sovereign authorityHobbes, Absolutism
Pactum unionisPact of union among individuals; in Hobbes, coincides with the pactum subiectionisHobbes, Contract Theory
Geometric methodApplication of mathematical-deductive reasoning to moral and political philosophyHobbes, Method

Authors Comparison

ThemeHobbesGrozioLocke
Human natureEgoistic, asocial, driven by fear and desireNaturally sociable, rationalRational, naturally free
State of natureWar of all against allPeaceful but precariousState of freedom and equality
Natural lawPrudential rules for self-preservationUniversal moral principlesMoral law discoverable by reason
Source of rightsConvention (social contract)Nature and reasonGod and nature
SovereigntyAbsolute, indivisible, irrevocableLimited by natural lawLimited, revocable, based on consent
PropertyCreated by sovereign, not naturalNatural rightNatural right, pre-political
Right of resistanceNone (except self-preservation)LimitedExtensive when contract violated

Influences & Connections

Summary Formulas

  • Hobbes: Human reason, as calculative faculty, reveals that the only escape from the war of all against all is absolute sovereignty established through an irrevocable social contract.
  • Grozio: Natural law consists of universal moral principles discoverable by reason that would be valid even if God did not exist.
  • Locke: Government is legitimate only when based on consent and limited by natural rights; citizens retain the right to resist tyranny.

Timeline

YearEvent
1588Hobbes born at Westport, England
1603Hobbes enters Magdalen Hall, Oxford
1608Hobbes becomes tutor to William Cavendish
1625Grozio publishes De iure belli ac pacis
1628Hobbes translates Thucydides; discovers Euclidean geometry
1629Hobbes travels to France and Geneva
1634-1636Hobbes meets Galilei and followers of Mersenne
1640-1641Hobbes writes Elements of Law; moves to Paris; sends Objections to Descartes
1642Hobbes publishes De cive; English Civil War begins
1649Charles I executed
1651Hobbes publishes Leviathan; returns to London
1655Hobbes publishes De corpore
1658Hobbes publishes De homine
1679Hobbes dies at Hardwicke

Notable Quotes

“The life of man is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.” — Hobbes

“Covenants without the sword are but words, and of no strength to secure a man at all.” — Hobbes

“The condition of man is a condition of war of everyone against everyone.” — Hobbes


NOTE

This summary has been created to present the key points from the source text, which was automatically extracted using LLM. Please note that the summary may contain errors. It serves as an essential starting point for study and reference purposes.